CO129-031 - Public Offices - 1849 — Page 41

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Admir

Agent

Saw A Masin,

from the fourther

explanative offered by him to change the openin which he formuly proped, and that he had us intention whatem of revising the fects of "yptain Ellick in the matter

The following, therefre

appears to be a summary of this

Call:

made a

aclain

In 1839 Mr. Just to Captain Elliot which that efficer did not entertain; nothing

can be

traced in the Recreds of this office to show why Captain Elliot declined to Admit. Mr. Just's clarions, but it be infissed that there was

for his

May

good

Cause

dosing

otherwise this claim would have

received the same attention as the

One

one made

by M. Just for losses sustained by the plunder of the "Black Joke!

In Titmary 1845. A not moths another application of the some nature to Sir Henry Potting who, with the full means of ascntaining the forets, declived to recognize the claim.

In December 1840, afte

a lapse of minely se's Years, Mr. Just noives the claim".

I have no means

affording Your Lyaship further information on the secljust, or of testing, the truth of Mr. Just allegations His ebem appears to have been -negatived at the time it was made ney

ind when the facts of the case were -susceptible of proof by two separati anthe rities

Edit History

2026-05-17 13:14:43 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

40 Admir Agent Saw A Masin, from the fourther explanative offered by him to change the openin which he formuly proped, and that he had us intention whatem of revising the fects of "yptain Ellick in the matter The following, therefre appears to be a summary of this Call: made a aclain In 1839 Mr. Just to Captain Elliot which that efficer did not entertain; nothing can be traced in the Recreds of this office to show why Captain Elliot declined to Admit. Mr. Just's clarions, but it be infissed that there was for his May good Cause dosing otherwise this claim would have received the same attention as the One one made by M. Just for losses sustained by the plunder of the "Black Joke! In Titmary 1845. A not moths another application of the some nature to Sir Henry Potting who, with the full means of ascntaining the forets, declived to recognize the claim. In December 1840, afte a lapse of minely se's Years, Mr. Just noives the claim". I have no means affording Your Lyaship further information on the secljust, or of testing, the truth of Mr. Just allegations His ebem appears to have been -negatived at the time it was made ney ind when the facts of the case were -susceptible of proof by two separati anthe rities

Baseline (Original)

40 Admir Agent Saw A Masin, from the fourther explanative offered by him to change. the openin which he formuly proped, and that he had us intention whatem of revising the fects of "yptain Ellick in the matter The following, therefre appears to be a summary of this Call: made a aclain In 1839 Mr. Just to Captain Elliot which that efficer did not entertain; nothing can be traced in the Recreds of this office to show why Captain Elliot declined to Admit. Mr. Just's clarions, but it be infissed that there was for his May good Cause dosing otherwise this claim would have received the same attention as the One one made by M. Just for losses sustained by the plunder of the "Black Joke! In Titmary 1845. A not moths another application of the some nature to Sir Henry Potting who, with the full means of ascntaining the forets, declived to recognize the claim. In December 1840, afte a lapse of minely se's Years, Mr. Just noives the claim". I have no means affording Your Lyaship further information on the secljust, or of testing, the truth of Mr. Just allegations His ebem appears to have been -negatived at the time it was made ney ind when the facts of the case were -susceptible of proof by two separati anthe rities

2026-05-17 13:14:43 · Baseline

View content